Taylor swift connection with Blake Lively’s movie “He ends up with us,” acting lively and Justin Baldoni, deepened.
Re -interviews reveal that Swift may have had a hand in casting Isabela Ferrer, a rise star that played the younger version of Livy’s character, Lily Bloom.
Baldoni wanted to choose an actress who resembled lively because she was so “recognizable”. The director noted as Ferrer “saliva” is a picture of “vibrant, and she is also a” phenomenal “actress.
“I was acting, and I actually brought and showed her a cassette for casting Blake and Taylor, and both were, like,” Yes! She “,” Baldoni said in an interview with “Access Hollywood.” “And that’s a true story.”
New defendants in Blake Lively, Justin Baldoni Legal Drama ‘can make or break the case’: expert
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f309/8f30918029e2b97cb037d5af30f029e6e067c1ef" alt="Taylor Swift on Grammys next to a photo of Isabel Ferrer and Blake Lively"
Taylor Swift had an impact on throwing a young Lily Bloom in “Ends with us”, according to the interviews that were resurficated. (Getty Images)
Baldonia’s mention of Swift confirmed the comments that Ferrer gave in an interview with “Extra”.
Ferrer claimed that Swift had influenced her casting on the premiere “It ends with us” in August.
“I don’t even know if I need to say that, but I say that,” she told the socket when asked about Swift. “Yes, she was a useful part of the audition process, which I learned later after I got it, and that was swinging my world. I have no words.”
Fox News Digital addressed the SWIFT comment representative.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2dbfe/2dbfe6184f367c22d4d0b5229d5cccbd922a0c21" alt="Blake Lively and Isabel Ferrer posing together"
Blake Lively and Isabel Ferrer in New York 31 July 2024. (Gotham/GC Pictures)
This is not the first time Swift is associated with “ends with us” after Lively Baldoni For sexual harassment. Baldoni replied, suing Lively and her husband Ryan Reynolds for civic extortion and slander.
In a long time lane divided into Baldoni’s website, who also contains a changed complaint against Lively and her husband, the actor and director shared the text exchange between the film’s producer, Jamey Heath, the executive director of Sony and the Executive Director Sony Marketing (who allegedly talked to Lively), which details, which details lively alleged “escalating requirements” for publishing a movie and “concealed threats” Due to the use of Swift’s song, “My Suze Ricochet”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c37/e6c377c81ff760e0ac12d69c9835aa9f9bb5a2be" alt="Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively Film ends with us"
Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively played together in “Ends with us.” (Getty Images)
“While Lively holds a movie as a hostage in the edit room, she at the same time stops marketing film by refusing to approve the key materials, including the trailer edition,” the time tape said, with screenshots of different messages between three people.
“Lively will not approve of trailer letting out unless she has been approved more time in the editing room with her personal editor. Add pressure, she lived vibrant threat, implying that she could” change his mind “about getting taylor swift to ensure that The use of ‘my tears ricochet’ for trailer is ensured if its requirements are not fulfilled. “
Swift’s song was later used in the film trailer, as well as in the scene in the movie.
Blake Lively Vs. Justin Baldoni: All you need to know
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd6e3/fd6e3b188018e9cbe63fba9bcb3d515f123fd051" alt="Blake Lively with Taylor Swift and Ryan Reynolds"
The trial of Blake Lively and Justin Baldonia 2026 could include Taylor Swift’s testimony. (Mega/GC Pictures; DameBK/Bauer-Giffin/GC Images)
Despite Swift’s connection with the drama “Ends with us”, the pop star has a “good chance” to get out of testimony whether the legal struggle will go to the trial of 2026.
“To the extent that Taylor Swift depositions are likely to lead to relevant information in the case, she could call for testify at the precipitate and/or to provide documentary evidence in support,” said Ethan Krasnoo, partner to Reavis Page Jump LLP, For Fox News Digital. “But Taylor Swift could try to abolish a court call, claiming it was a fishing expedition or is intended to damage the vivid damage to her friendship with Swift, not to acquire relevant or necessary information.
“Given the minimum impact on the merit of the case and the fact that the party in litigation, including vibrant, probably have many the same relevant information that Taylor Swift had, should be called to deposit, there is a good chance that the proposal to abolish the stage was successful. “
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37ec6/37ec6b4c29e9bc6f260c0f5aa812a819ef0ba1c1" alt="Taylor Swift shines in a black mini dress with Best friend Blake Lively"
Blake Livelya’s friendship with Taylor Swift was brought up during a legal drama between actress and Justin Baldonia. (Gotham)
Baldoni also mentioned Swift in a lawsuit, sharing texts exchanged between him and lively. The “Jane The Virgin” star claimed that she used her friendship with Swift vividly to threaten the actor to change the script “ends with us”. While working on film, Lively insisted on copying the scene on the roof. Baldoni hesitated in connection with the idea, but he told Lively that he would “look at what she had put together,” the appeal said.
After that, vibrantly called Baldonia to her New York City Home, where the actor said he felt Swift, and Reynolds pressed him to use Lively’s prescribing scene.
“Later, Baldoni felt obliged to write lively to say that he liked her pages and did not need Reynolds and her friend Megacelebrity to press him,” the appeal said.
“I really love what you have done. It really helps. Makes him so much more fun and more interesting. (And so I would feel without Ryan and Taylor (emoji), you really talent over the entire panel. Really excited ND (SIC) grateful He works together, “Baldoni’s text said, according to the appeal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0b51/c0b51761b86abd9e7d54bbf6ffcafdd3e91bf591" alt="Ashley Avignone, Ice Spice, Taylor Swift and Blake Lively talk before the NFL Super Bowl 58 football match"
Blake Lively and Taylor Swift have been friends for years. (AP Photo/David Becker)
As you read? Click here for more news about fun
A lively long -lasting response, in which she headed Swift and Reynolds as the “dragons” that protects it.
“I Ryan and (redicted) established themselves as absolute titans as writers and storytellers outside their primary gig – just singing or just acting or (redicted) just directing. I’m so happy to have them as creative barometers,” lively text, included in appeal, he said.
“But also that I have them as people who support me and make sure I see myself for everything I can, and they offer. Because they know first -hand everything I contribute. They also know that I am not always so good at ensuring that I have seen they have seen them and used for the fear of threats of the ego or the fear of the lightness of the process.
Click here to sign up for a bulletin for fun
If the judge decides that Swift’s connection has a relevant influence on the case, the “Midnights” singer could have to take an attitude. Deposits in civic cases have “liberal rules”, other legal expert explained Fox News Digital.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d6ed/4d6ed07d77896dcc234c923a5e68d20db9bf5e62" alt="Taylor Swift points to the field next to Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman"
Justin Baldoni mentioned Taylor Swift in his litigation and in his time of events he shared to support his claims against Blake Lively. (Dustin Satloff)
“The civil lawsuit party can seek testimony from any individual who is likely to have relevant and material information,” explained New York lawyer Nicole Brenecki. “What is” relevant “and” material “is understandable to include all information that could have an effect on the outcome of the case.
“If Taylor Swift’s testimony is in any way relevant to the topic of this litigation, the chairman judge should order the court call for her testimony, unless the lawyer seeking her testimony completely and completely cannot show that the testimony would be in any what a way relevant. “
Click here to get the Fox News app
Christina Dugan Ramirez contributed to Christina Digital Digital.