In the comical case of irony, Anthropic, the leading programmer of artificial intelligence, asks the applicant for their open working role to confirm that they will Do not use AI in the application procedure.
Anthropic develops Claud, Chatbot, who is well appreciated for its friendly conversation and coding ability. The company has raised nearly $ 11 billion funding companies with a deep pocket like Google and Amazon to compete against Openi in the race to artificial general intelligence or AI that can replace most people for most tasks. More recently, he demonstrated Claud’s ability download control over user devices To fulfill the tasks for them, a form of an “agent ai” which is an openii They also build.
For all the glittering and whirlwinds on how they became great Ai chatboti, when pushed, anthropically, he obviously doesn’t think he’s good enough to be replaced completely for a man. “Although we encourage people to use AI systems during their role to help them work faster and more efficiently, do not use AI assistants during the application process,” they say in applications. “We want to understand your personal interest in anthrop without mediation through AI system, and we also want to evaluate your communication skills that have not been assisted. List “yes” if you read and agreed. “The field was first noticed by an open code programmer Simon Willison and reported 404 Media.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jqx18kgizae
Of course, someone in the first place has to develop AI systems, so that makes sense. Computers by themselves do not have characteristics inherent in people, such as an agency or creativity. Openi -O’s model generation of Sora’s video can make impressive videos, but one still has to use his taste to create something convincing and interesting to watch.
In the world of software engineering, there is a huge anxiety that AI will replace engineering jobs, even if the coding models still make a lot of mistakes. AI advocates claim that technology will only make developers more effective and therefore will be able to develop even more programs that would not have resources to build in the past. Skeptics, however, think that leaders of the main companies will replace people Ai, even if they know that he is not as good as a man, because the Labor is almost always the biggest cost of costs in the company. Sales power and Clear We have publicly announced that they have been able to replace the functions of the user services to chatbots, but we do not have a clear picture of what it really means and how experience is compared to the support of a man -guided man.
At least for now, Anthrops are not quite ready to put his money where his mouth is. When it comes to critical tasks, the company still wants to know that one can do all the job. How would other companies consider using AI interpret it?